The World Cup’s over now, but there’s a little point that’s keeps gnawing at me. I followed the World Cup primarily through Yahoo!’s sports site (previously mentioned for its poor choices in headline truncation), and I have to admit that despite my general disdain for comments on sports sites, I found myself actually following theirs. Not, of course, because the comments offered any insights, but rather out of a worrisome inability to stop looking at them. They were mini-Medusas, turning my brain to stone each time I looked upon their inane blabberings and tried to figure out why the commenter thought I needed to hear their thoughts. And worse, they had a siren’s song, a cer—n undeniable beauty in their weird blend of nationalism, chauvinism, mockery, pop culture references, and insanity that kept me unable to turn away.
Curious about the dashes in cer—n? Well, so am I. Yahoo!’s commenting software has an apparently very strange censorship module in it. Like a standard censorship module, it replaces words it finds offensive with dashes. In order to deter the more clever vulgarians, it also replaces dirty words hidden within other words. This is why glasses is censored into gl— in the following comment:
That’s a little out of the ordinary; in my experience, most automatic-censoring software checks against a dictionary, and lets words whose only fault is containing an obscene word go through untouched. This isn’t a hard feature to program in, so I am led to believe that Yahoo! consciously decided to omit it. Maybe they were having trouble with commenters using minced oaths like “We’re going to kick your glasses!” and they decided to remove even within-word obscenities to foil them. That would also explain this comment:
I’m going to go out on a limb and suppose that the commenter wished to offer major quantities of kudos, which would of course be censored by a censor that seeks out vulgarities lurking within words. Nothing too weird there. But then I found these comments:
Apparently FIFA president Sepp Blatter isn’t the only one against technology; Yahoo!’s censor is adamant that the word not be reproduced in full. For some reason, the string gy is marked as obscene. The only explanation I can come up with for that is that the censor wanted to prevent brainiacs slipping gay by the censor by omitting its vowel. That’s an implausible explanation, though, especially since I’ve seen gay come through uncensored in other comments.
Now what about the censorship I engaged in in the opening paragraph, cer—n? Why would I do something so silly? Well, check out these comments:
Based on context, surely the censored words in the comments above are meant to be Captain, certain, and entertaining, which suggests that the Yahoo! censor believes tai to be a vulgarity.*
I was worried that my lexicon of vulgarities had fallen out of date, which would ruin the street cred that I have so precisely cultivated, so I rushed onto Urban Dictionary to find out what made tai censorable. Strangely, there was only one obscene definition for tai on Urban Dictionary. But I don’t think that it has anywhere near the general appeal to need censoring; it was the eighth definition listed on Urban Dictionary, buried under references to the band The Academy Is… and a claims that folks with the name Tai are “unusually fly”, “elite, perfect, cool guy in planet”, and “a total badass”. I tried looking on Google, but struck out there as well, with searches for “tai obscene” and “tai vulgarity” not returning anything useful.**
Does anyone have any idea what’s going on here? Have I offended you by saying gy and tai all willy-nilly? If so, please accept my heartfelt apolo—.
—
*: Perhaps, you’re thinking, it’s not tai that’s obscene but rather ta or tain, which are also in all three words. Judging from the gl— and quan—ies examples, though, it appears that all and only the obscene letters are dashed out.
**: I was shocked to find out you could search for any phrase with “obscene” in it and not get a single porn site. I found that especially surprising with “Tai” given that Kobe Tai was a famous pornographic actress in the late 90s.
10 comments
Comments feed for this article
July 29, 2010 at 9:12 am
Daniel
My guess is that the program censors vulgarities in other languages, and “tai” and “gy” are vulgarities in other languages. No idea what language or what they might mean, though. If it’s not too late to enter comments, you could test this theory by entering the word “fickle” and seeing if it comes out “—-le”.
I’m also amused by the fact that Ana M’s post in the third example indicates that while it censors words like “asses” and “tit” even inside other words, it lets “hell” pass right on through even when written as its own word.
July 29, 2010 at 10:02 am
Aманда
On the topic of censorship: ever heard of the Clbuttic Mistake?
July 29, 2010 at 9:44 pm
Dan M.
You’re not find porn when you search for “X obscene” because Google defaults to “safe-search”.
I’m not sure how to turn if off if you don’t log into a google account, by try http://www.google.com/preferences (Though it indicates that the default behavior is to only filter images…)
August 3, 2010 at 5:14 am
Alon
Can’t offer an opinion on gy, but tai is a mildly vulgar word for “dung” in Bahasa Indonesia, and like its English equivalent shit it’s in common use as an expletive.
That said, Yahoo’s must be the worst piece of filtering software ever written, and that’s a lot to say in a notoriously moron-friendly field.
August 3, 2010 at 12:57 pm
Emily Michelle
This was like a word game: insert profanities to complete the word! I don’t know if it would catch on, but I enjoyed it.
August 7, 2010 at 10:15 am
blah@blah.com
Yahoo actively engages in real-time censorship aside from just automated programs based on political and social opinions and biases. Anything negatively associated with homosexually yahoo often omits. Anything associated with communism yahoo often omits. Anything associated with facts about statutes, bills, and laws is very often omitted and censored. Yahoo’s editors are actively engaged in censorship on a daily basis if the comments are not to their liking and do not meet their agenda of herding the popular opinion in a particular direction. I applaud Google for standing up against censorship and human rights violations in China, but am appalled and disturbed that Yahoo is engaging in censorship right in its own backyard.
September 14, 2011 at 11:31 pm
sophia
Blah Blah.com….most excellent and accurate comment!
I t have experienced Yahoo’s biased comments…if you don’t support a liberal agenda on yahoo comments, they remove your post and send redirects all over the place…wouldn’t be surpirsed to find a worm or trojan they palnt in the process of signing in, as sign in page is a LOCKED REDIRECT!
It’s SUPPOSED to be ILLEGAL! I hope someone investigates them! People have made criminal comments and THOSE COMMENTS ARE ALLOWED, so Yahoo is also complicit in PROMOTING VIOLENT CRIME!
March 1, 2015 at 11:51 am
antje adam
I commented on the girls that left for Syria
Mentioned backward parents that did not allow them a normal teenage life and did not allow them to get rid of those moronic headscarves
Did not use expletives and my comment was comparatively mild.
Comment was deleted, never got an email to appeal.
Must be a Muslim deleter there who does not like ‘backward’ and ‘moronic headscarf’
March 3, 2015 at 5:28 pm
Travis
I avoid all Yahoo products specifically because, as a programmer myself, I noticed nearly 20 years ago that their software is consistently bad. They seem unable to write even the most basic pieces of code. I suspect this has less to do with the programmers themselves, and more to do with the software designers directing them, and their design processes.
June 22, 2021 at 6:57 am
GeoX
sophia and antje adam DO both sound fairly moronic, for what it’s worth.