Let’s kick off the review session by addressing a confusion that will get you relentlessly and uninterestingly mocked: homophonic pairs. These are pairs like your and you’re or affect and effect, which are pronounced the same but spelled differently. Even if you know the difference between them, you’re still going to screw them up occasionally, especially in quick emails or when you’re writing with your attention wandering. (I probably type the wrong one about 1% of the time, which doesn’t sound like too much until you think about how often one of these words gets used.)
I’m going to look at a subset of these homophonic pairs here, the ones where one member of the pair is a contraction. These are the aforementioned your/you’re, as well as their/there/they’re, its/it’s, and whose/who’s.
In all four of these cases, the word with the apostrophe is the one that can be written as two words. You’re is the contraction for you are, they’re is they are, it’s is it is, and who’s is who is. Thus:
(1a) Do you mind if I dance with your date?
(1b) It seems you’re [you are] offended for some reason.
(2a) I think those tourists left their suitcases behind.
(2b) Yup, those suitcases over there.
(2c) Let’s see if they’re [they are] full of money.
(3a) I couldn’t open the suitcase because its lock was too strong.
(3b) I know, it’s [it is] a shame.
(4a) Do you know anyone whose skill set includes lock-picking?
(4b) Wait, who’s [who is] a cop?
Pretty straightforward, right? The words with the apostrophes are always contractions of two words, a pronoun and a form of the verb be. The words without apostrophes are possessives (and also the locative there). It seems like you ought to just remember apostrophes = two words, no apostrophes = possessives. Easy peasy.
But if it’s so easy, why is it so hard? The trouble is that these homophones don’t exist in a vacuum, and the rest of English exists to sow confusion. When you think of forming a possessive, no doubt your first thought is of the apostrophe-s. That’s because most (singular) nouns are made possessive with apostrophe-s: rabbit’s foot, someone else’s fault, etc. As a result, it’s and who’s look possessive even though they’re not.
The trick is that (personal) pronouns never use apostrophe-s in their possessive forms; in fact, many of them don’t even use an s.* They have their own special forms: my, your, his, her, its, our, their. If you remember that pronouns don’t take apostrophe-s, then its/it’s and whose/who’s are a lot easier to decide between.
Another way to think about it is that only one member of the pair can have the apostrophe (otherwise there’d be no confusion). And connecting two contracted words needs an apostrophe more than signalling possession does. Since there’s only one apostrophe to go around, the contraction gets it over the possessive.**
Summary: If your and you’re or it’s and its are confusing you, remember that contractions always have an apostrophe, and possessive pronouns never do.
—
*: Never say never. Impersonal (one) and indefinite (e.g., everybody) pronouns do take apostrophe-s. Luckily, these ones don’t have as prominent of homophones and don’t cause many problems for writers.
**: Of course, that’s merely a mnemonic. There is no rule of English that says this, and the historical development that led to pronomial possessives not having apostrophes was not a result of this.
12 comments
Comments feed for this article
September 4, 2012 at 11:15 am
Back-to-School Review: the series « Motivated Grammar
[…] Back-to-School Reviews so far: I: Confusing contractions (your, you’re and the lot) [09/04/12] Rate this:Want to share?FacebookStumbleUponDiggEmailTwitterLike this:LikeBe the first to […]
September 4, 2012 at 12:39 pm
Warsaw Will
I wonder if you know whether this is more of a problem for native speakers than non-native learners. As an EFL teacher, I haven’t noticed that these common homophones cause learners much of a problem.
September 4, 2012 at 12:52 pm
Emily
This is one I never get wrong when I’m thinking about it but frequently get wrong when I’m not paying attention. Have you ever heard the song about its vs. it’s? It’s sung to the Duke of York:
I T apostrophe S always means “it is,”
I T S shows possession like “my” or “her” or “his.”
(Strongbad of Homestarrunner.com fame does a version that I prefer, as it uses the word “scallywag.”) I always struggled with that particular pair of words, long after I’d mastered you’re/your and they’re/there/their, but then someone taught me that song just before the second time I took the ACT and I swear it raised my score. And now, ten years later, I still have to sing it to myself frequently.
September 4, 2012 at 2:25 pm
Dw
Affect and effect are n
September 4, 2012 at 2:27 pm
dw
Affect and effect are not homophonous in my accent (split weak vowels). The first vowel of “affect” is commA, and the first vowel of “effect” is rabbIt.
Apologies for the earlier abortive comment — that’ll teach me to attempt to comment from an iPhone. Where’s the CAPTCHA when you need it? :)
September 4, 2012 at 5:23 pm
the ridger
I dunno. If it was that easy, people would get it right a lot more than they do. I probably type them wrong as often as not (I don’t *write* them wrong), and then I have to correct it.The hardest thing is catching it when I’m proofing – I read right over them.
September 4, 2012 at 5:38 pm
Mike Pope
It’s no wonder (to me, anyway) that people don’t get apostrophes right for possessives. As you note, nouns get them, pronouns don’t, except when they do. Plus contractions do, even if they don’t entirely make sense. (What exactly is being elided in “won’t”?)
What the heck kind of system is this? One that people just aren’t going to work that hard to master, that’s what. And really, can we blame people?
September 4, 2012 at 10:33 pm
Will
You can make just about any spelling or grammar mistake in English writing and I’ll understand your meaning on a first read through, but for some reason the misspelling of these homophonic words can really cause me to balk.
I would also include “to” and “too” in this category, though a “to/too” error is probably less likely to throw off my reading comprehension than a misplaced “there/they’re/their”.
September 5, 2012 at 10:44 am
Ado_Annie
I have to agree with the ridger, I rarely write these words wrong in context, but put me in front of a keyboard and my fingers seem to have a vocabulary of their own. Especially with words that get used often, an/and, for instance. Then if it is a technical paper I have to print it out (divorce it from myself) to be able to proof, otherwise I, too, can read right over my own mistakes. I call it keyboard blindness. And I was just complaining on Sentence First about poor or nonexistent editing/proofing in newer books with just those words. Karma comes back to bite me.
September 5, 2012 at 11:10 am
pros write
Reblogged this on Pros Write and commented:
Motivated Grammar provided an excellent discussion of word choice — specifically confusing homphones (like “your” and “you’re”).
September 6, 2012 at 5:08 pm
Noel Williams (prhayz) www.prhayz.com
This is a Excellent lesson. Thanks so much for sharing.
September 8, 2012 at 8:04 am
Your Making Homophonic Mistakes! « Teacher Fabio
[…] want to take the risk of losing opportunities because of silly mistakes, take a look at the article Back-to-School Review: Confusing Contractions. Besides clarifying the homophonic issue (including the meaning of such word), there are also some […]